Skip to main content

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and its impact.

 Why did the Silicon Valley Bank collapse?

The Silicon Valley Bank(SVB) which is best known for its financial services and solutions to the technology and innovation sector. It was founded in 1988 in Santa Clara, California. It provides a wide range of financial services, which includes commercial bank, investment bank and private banking. It offers venture capital financing, asset

management, foreign exchange and treasury management. Throughout the years it had established itself as a leading bank for investment in the technology and innovation sector which is known for its high risk. Despite its success, SVB has faced its share of challenges over the years, which includes the impact of economic slowdown and changing market conditions. Also the stocks in the technology sector is facing downturn over the past few years and the hiking of interest rates by the US federal reserve to combat inflation. The reason of the collapse is that as the venture capital firms were drying up of cash and need to tap in their existing funds. So they

started withdrawing their deposits, so to meet the requirement of their customers the bank started selling its own assets. During the past few years the bank has bought billion of dollars of bonds as this is how a typical bank operate. As the demand of cash rose, the bank sold their typically safe bonds at a loss and those loss added up to that point that they became insolvent.


Why is this crisis compared to the 2008 financial crisis? 

During the 2008 financial crisis, there was a widespread failure of global financial system. The cause is the combination of various factors such as a housing bubble, subprime mortgage lending, deregulation of financial institutions and excess risk taking by the banks and financial institutions. The crisis started in the United states with the subprime mortgage which refers to the lending and

 borrowing of home loans to individuals with poor credit history, low-income levels or high debt-to-income ratio. This is what happens when the housing market collapsed and so Washington Mutual which has asset worth of $307 billion, the collapse caused

the value to mortgage to plummet, causing widespread defaults and foreclousers. This time two banks collapsed Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank which has combined assets of $327 billion. 


Impact on Indian Startups

SVB offered an easy way to Indian startups to park their cash especially those in the Software as a Service sector, those who has clients in the US. As they could set up their account without a US Social Security Number(SSN) or Income Tax Identification Number. When the collapse happened the US government shuts down the bank and asked companies with accounts containing 250,000 to contact a toll- free number. But still many Indian Startups who has 250,000 or more in their account have to wait several days to get their money back. Also the Indian Government also stepped in and have a meeting with the Indian Startups. The IT Ministry expected to recommend exploring options of startups being allowed to transfer money from their SVB account to Indian banks without facing taxation issues, and to urge the Finance Ministry to allow overseas branches of Indian banks to accept deposits from these startups.


Conclusion

As of now it does not seem like this is going to be a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis as most banks are far more diversified. Also the US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the CBS that "Let me be clear that during the financial crisis, there were investors and owners of systematic large banks that were bailed out and the reform that have been put in place means we are not going to do that again". Although she also said that they are concerned about the depositers and are trying to meet their needs. 


  


Comments

  1. A JOB WELL DONE, BRO. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. LOOKING FORWARD TO MORE

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Russian Government's decision to put nuclear weapons in Belarus.

 On Saturday, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced plans on Saturday to station nuclear weapons in neighboring Belarus, sending a warning to NATO over its support to Ukraine and escalating stand off with West. While, Putin said the move would not violate nuclear non-proliferation promises, it is one of Russia's pronounced nuclear signals since the start of the war. He also added that this move was triggered by Britain's decisions this past week to provide Ukraine   with armor-piercing rounds containing depleted uranium. In addition, Russia is presenting the deployment not just as a decision made by both countries,, but as a response to long-standing requests by Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko. This is Russia's tried-and-tested way of showing respect for its ally, previously cited when dispatching Russian troops to Belarus for training exercises both last February- ahead of the invasion - and in October. Tactical nuclear weapons are intended  for use on the ...

Why Credit Suisse shares are falling?

On March 15, credit Suisse shed a quarter of its value after its largest shareholder said it could not provide any more support. Saudi national Bank(SNB) who is the largest shareholder which hold about 9.9% credit Swiss, said it would not buy any more shares. According to the statement of SNB chairman Ammar Al Khudairy "we cannot because we would go above 10 per cent. Its a regulatory issue". After that the shares of credit Swiss dropped by as much as 30%, which leads to a fall of 7% in the European banking index. The stick has pummelled earlier in the week due to the collapse of US tech lender silicon valley Bank. The analysts of France said that the credit Suisse want a bailout by the Swiss National Bank and financial regulator FINMA, possibly one or more other banks. The analysts also said that the Saudi National Bank could do a U-turn.. Last year the Saudi National Bank has increased it stake in credit Suisse and committed to invest up to $1.5 dollars. On Tuesday the ban...

US-India Jet Engine Deal: A Boost for Both Countries

  US-India Jet Engine Agreement: A Boost for Both Countries The United States and India are close to finalizing an agreement to jointly manufacture fighter jet engines in India. The deal, which would involve General Electric (GE) partnering with state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), is seen as a significant step forward in India’s efforts to develop a domestic defence industrial base. Currently, India relies on imports for most of its fighter jet engines. The deal would allow India to produce advanced jet engines, which would give it greater self-reliance in the defence sector. It would also strengthen India’s strategic partnership with the US. The deal is still in the early stages of negotiations, but if it is successful, it would be a major boost for both countries. For the US, the deal would help to secure a long-term customer for its advanced jet engine technology. For India, the deal would help to meet its growing demand for fighter jets and would give it a more sec...